Machine learning > Model Interpretability > Interpretation Techniques > Global vs Local Interpretability

Understanding Global and Local Model Interpretability

Model interpretability is crucial for building trust and understanding in machine learning models. This tutorial explores the concepts of global and local interpretability, their differences, and practical techniques for achieving them. We'll delve into when to use each approach and provide illustrative examples.

Introduction to Model Interpretability

Model interpretability refers to the ability to explain why a machine learning model makes certain predictions. It helps us understand the relationship between input features and model outputs. Interpretability is essential for debugging models, ensuring fairness, building trust with stakeholders, and complying with regulations. Two main types of interpretability exist: global and local.

Global Interpretability: Understanding the Overall Model Behavior

Global interpretability aims to understand how the model functions as a whole. It seeks to reveal the general relationships the model has learned between features and the target variable. This allows us to understand the model's decision-making process across the entire dataset. Examples of techniques that enable global interpretability include feature importance scores, partial dependence plots (PDPs), and global surrogate models.

Local Interpretability: Explaining Individual Predictions

Local interpretability focuses on explaining why the model made a specific prediction for a single data instance. It seeks to understand the contribution of each feature to the prediction for that particular input. Techniques like LIME (Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations) and SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) are commonly used for local interpretability. These methods approximate the complex model locally with a simpler, interpretable model.

Key Differences: Global vs. Local

The primary difference lies in the scope of explanation. Global interpretability explains the model's behavior across the entire dataset, providing a general understanding of the model's learned relationships. In contrast, Local interpretability focuses on explaining individual predictions, offering insights into why the model made a particular decision for a specific instance. Global interpretability provides a macro-level view, while local interpretability provides a micro-level view.

Feature Importance (Global)

This code snippet demonstrates how to calculate and visualize feature importances using a Random Forest model in scikit-learn. First, it loads the data and separates features (X) from the target variable (y). Then, it splits the data into training and testing sets. A Random Forest model is trained on the training data. The `feature_importances_` attribute of the trained model provides a score for each feature, indicating its relative importance in predicting the target variable. The code then creates a Pandas DataFrame to store these importances, sorts them in descending order, and plots them using Matplotlib. This plot provides a global view of which features are most influential in the model's predictions.

python
import pandas as pd
from sklearn.ensemble import RandomForestClassifier
from sklearn.model_selection import train_test_split
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt

# Load your data
data = pd.read_csv('your_data.csv') # Replace 'your_data.csv' with your actual file
X = data.drop('target', axis=1)  # Replace 'target' with your target variable name
y = data['target']

# Split data into training and testing sets
X_train, X_test, y_train, y_test = train_test_split(X, y, test_size=0.2, random_state=42)

# Train a Random Forest model
model = RandomForestClassifier(random_state=42)
model.fit(X_train, y_train)

# Get feature importances
importances = model.feature_importances_

# Create a DataFrame for feature importances
feature_importances = pd.DataFrame({'Feature': X.columns, 'Importance': importances})
feature_importances = feature_importances.sort_values('Importance', ascending=False)

# Plot feature importances
plt.figure(figsize=(10, 6))
plt.bar(feature_importances['Feature'], feature_importances['Importance'])
plt.xticks(rotation=45, ha='right')
plt.xlabel('Features')
plt.ylabel('Importance')
plt.title('Feature Importances')
plt.tight_layout()
plt.show()

LIME (Local)

This code snippet demonstrates how to use LIME to explain a single prediction made by a Random Forest model. First, it loads and preprocesses the data similarly to the feature importance example. Then, it trains a Random Forest model. A `LimeTabularExplainer` object is created, which requires the training data, feature names, and class names. An instance from the test set is selected for explanation. The `explain_instance` method generates an explanation by perturbing the instance and observing how the model's prediction changes. The `show_in_notebook` method displays the explanation, highlighting the features that most contributed to the model's prediction for that specific instance.

python
import lime
import lime.lime_tabular
import pandas as pd
from sklearn.ensemble import RandomForestClassifier
from sklearn.model_selection import train_test_split

# Load your data
data = pd.read_csv('your_data.csv') # Replace 'your_data.csv' with your actual file
X = data.drop('target', axis=1)  # Replace 'target' with your target variable name
y = data['target']

# Split data into training and testing sets
X_train, X_test, y_train, y_test = train_test_split(X, y, test_size=0.2, random_state=42)

# Train a Random Forest model
model = RandomForestClassifier(random_state=42)
model.fit(X_train, y_train)

# Create a LIME explainer
explainer = lime.lime_tabular.LimeTabularExplainer(training_data=X_train.values,
                                                   feature_names=X_train.columns,
                                                   class_names=['0', '1'], # Replace with your class names if needed
                                                   mode='classification')

# Choose an instance to explain (e.g., the first instance in the test set)
instance = X_test.iloc[0]

# Explain the prediction for the chosen instance
explanation = explainer.explain_instance(data_row=instance.values,
                                         predict_fn=model.predict_proba,
                                         num_features=5) # Number of features to highlight

# Show the explanation
explanation.show_in_notebook(show_table=True)

Real-Life Use Case Section

Loan Application Approval:
Imagine a bank using a machine learning model to determine whether to approve a loan application. Global interpretability can help the bank understand which factors (e.g., credit score, income, debt-to-income ratio) the model generally relies on to make decisions. Local interpretability can explain why a specific application was rejected, highlighting the factors that contributed most to the negative decision. This allows the bank to provide feedback to the applicant and ensure fair lending practices.

When to use them

Use global interpretability when you need to understand the overall behavior and decision-making logic of the model across the entire dataset. It's useful for debugging, validating model assumptions, and communicating the model's behavior to stakeholders. Use local interpretability when you need to explain why the model made a specific prediction for a particular data point. It is useful for understanding individual decisions, identifying potential biases in specific cases, and providing personalized explanations.

Best Practices

  • Choose the right technique: Select interpretability techniques appropriate for your model type and the type of explanation needed (global or local).
  • Validate explanations: Ensure that the explanations generated by the techniques are consistent with your understanding of the data and the model.
  • Consider multiple perspectives: Combine both global and local interpretability techniques to gain a comprehensive understanding of the model.
  • Communicate clearly: Present the explanations in a clear and understandable manner to stakeholders, avoiding technical jargon where possible.

Interview Tip

When discussing model interpretability in an interview, be prepared to explain the differences between global and local interpretability, provide examples of techniques for each, and discuss the benefits and limitations of each approach. Emphasize the importance of interpretability for building trust, ensuring fairness, and debugging models. Also, mentioning the model agnostic approaches are always a plus.

Pros of Global Interpretability

  • Provides a holistic understanding of the model's behavior.
  • Helps identify potential biases or unintended relationships in the model.
  • Facilitates communication with stakeholders about the model's decision-making process.

Cons of Global Interpretability

  • Can be challenging to achieve for complex models.
  • May not capture the nuances of the model's behavior in specific regions of the input space.
  • May require simplifying assumptions that sacrifice accuracy.

Pros of Local Interpretability

  • Provides detailed explanations for individual predictions.
  • Helps identify potential errors or biases in specific cases.
  • Enables personalized feedback and explanations to users.

Cons of Local Interpretability

  • Can be computationally expensive to generate explanations for a large number of instances.
  • May not generalize well to other instances.
  • Explanations may be unstable or sensitive to small changes in the input.

← Understanding Feature Importance in Machine Learning Models Understanding SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) for Model Interpretability →

FAQ

  • What is the difference between model interpretability and explainability?

    The terms are often used interchangeably. However, interpretability often refers to the degree to which a human can understand the cause of a decision, while explainability encompasses methods and techniques used to make a model's decision-making process more understandable.
  • Which interpretability technique should I use?

    The best technique depends on the type of model, the type of explanation needed (global or local), and the specific goals of the analysis. Consider starting with simpler techniques like feature importance or partial dependence plots, and then exploring more advanced techniques like LIME or SHAP if necessary.
  • Can I trust the explanations generated by interpretability techniques?

    While interpretability techniques can provide valuable insights into model behavior, it is important to validate the explanations and critically evaluate their reliability. No technique is perfect, and explanations may be influenced by simplifying assumptions or biases in the data.